![]() |
The late, great sculptress Louise Bourgeois (1911-2010) and her sculpture Fillette in a 1982 portrait by the brilliant (and often-censored) photographer Robert Mapplethorpe. (Click-on post images for actual sizes.) |
(Update as of August 3, 2019: Originally this article was referred to as "Part 3b" of what I had intended to be a 3 part series. This has changed. It is now Part 4 of a 7 part series. My apologies for any confusion - DS.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9d96/a9d964213f618eb6e87755e87e28fd3fbc830b92" alt=""
Bourgeois does owe a lot to the feminist movement. Born in Paris in 1911, she spent many of her early years known merely as the wife of Robert Goldwater, the American art historian with whom she moved to New York in the late 1930s. Though she drew, painted, sculpted and printed throughout the 1940s and ‘50s, Bourgeois didn’t receive real art world attention until her 50s. She had to wait more than a few years before she moved from the periphery of art critics’ minds to somewhere closer to the center. During that time, the feminist movement was blooming."
- Excerpt from a December 25 (Bourgeois' birthday), 2017 Huffington Post article by Katherine Brooks entitled A Love Letter To Louise Bourgeois, A Feminist Icon Whether She Likes It Or Not. Inset right is one of Bourgeois' "mammoth spiders."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a146e/a146eabcdaf941b6401fab7123c8bf62fb921b99" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8209c/8209c897be79183784a99a06d47ef455b7e71bbd" alt=""
- From the Wiki entry for Flower Paintings of Georgia O'Keeffe. Inset left is an O'Keeffe orchid found there. Inset right is an element from Judy Chicago's tribute to O'Keeffe: a dinner plate from her ground-breaking, 1979 feminist art installation, The Dinner Party.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2613b/2613b3e76d23cc323d1cdd5c347d3eb755bd2fff" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c8c4/1c8c48394552eca5e901f263b412bf8154e686a0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d592f/d592f1390e11e7eb055ed3d5ac39b173d3cec23b" alt=""
- Sourced from the Wikiwand entry for Louise Nevelson. Inset right above is a portrait of Nevelson by Richard Avedon. Inset left is her 1985 piece, Mirror-Shadow VIII.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a9af/7a9af53a65a4ca187dd22aa3059382f0f4b1abe1" alt=""
"The first act of violence that patriarchy demands of males is not violence toward women. Instead patriarchy demands of all males that they engage in acts of psychic self-mutilation, that they kill off the emotional parts of themselves. If an individual is not successful in emotionally crippling himself, he can count on patriarchal men to enact rituals of power that will assault his self-esteem."
"Patriarchy both creates the rage in boys and then contains it for later use, making it a resource to exploit later on as boys become men. As a national product, this rage can be garnered to further imperialism, hatred and oppression of women and men globally. This rage is needed if boys are to become men willing to travel around the world to fight wars without ever demanding that other ways of solving conflict can be found.”
- A quote from feminist (and wise woman), bell hooks, (found here). Her photograph was sourced here. And, here's her blog (last updated September 29, 2016.)
(Update, April 8, 2019: I've just added a quote from a Vietnam vet that supports hooks' insight. It can be found in a footnote at the end of the post. I've also added another quote by hooks.)
____________________________________________________
The Newer Woman
Well, I guess the operative question is: what became of the New Woman? Did she simply morph into a Newer Woman?
No, not exactly. Two world wars got in the way. And, by the end of the second one, patriarchal society reasserted itself once again. The upshot is (in as few words as possible), after the disastrous effects of toxic-masculinity-in-action (i.e., war and genocide) depleted the world's population by millions (upon millions) of humans; the world's "little ladies" were obligated to return to the confines of the home, and dedicate their lives to what nature (and the state) intended: motherhood. In reality, the war machine needed new blood (literally) and more human fodder, the bloated corporate sector needed fresh regiments of gullible consumers, and the government needed its tax revenue which, in the form of new taxpayers (requiring new Social Security numbers) it was a patriotic citizen's "duty" to provide. Women were expected to push more and more babies out of their wombs (and purchase the latest soap-powder) while men were obliged to finance the whole deal (or die trying).*
Needless to say, the New Woman movement lost much of its momentum during the post-war years of the mid-1900s. But, then, in (almost) Karmic retaliation, the Baby Boomer generation was spawned. And, the Baby Boomers, in turn, beget the 60s... a time when pretty much all the best-laid plans of white mice and white men went straight to hell. Well, at least, for a decade or two. It was as if, suddenly, all the King's horses, vassals and concubines no longer gave a hoot about putting Humpty Dumpty back together again, but, instead, decided to make an omelet (with his remains) which all might share... regardless of race, religion, nationality, gene-pools or gender. And, it was from this mighty upheaval that second-wave feminism was born.
This is not to say that all females of artistic persuasion were driven underground during the post-war period. No, the feminist spirit was kept alive by a number of female artists who had been born later in the time-frame, at the very end of the 19th century. Many of these women also gravitated to Paris, and it is their artwork which illuminates this section.
First in line: the 1939 painting, Rhythm Colour no. 1076, by Ukrainian-born French artist Sonia Delaunay (1885-1979) - above, inset left - who co-founded Orphism (a form of cubism) with her more celebrated husband, French artist, Robert Delauney. Wiki tells us that "she was the first living female artist to have a retrospective exhibition at the Louvre in 1964."
As it was, she was one of four female artists initially considered Cubists and one of three who survived the wars to witness the next wave of feminism in bloom. The one Cubist who tragically missed the new resurgence was Spanish artist María Blanchard (1881-1939), whose 1916 painting Composición cubista appears next (above, inset right). Above, inset left, is Composition cubiste by Polish painter Alice (or Alicja) Halicka (1894-1975), while (directly) inset right is a portrait of artist Diego Rivera by Russian-born (Cubist-turned-pointillist) Marie Bronislava Vorobyeva-Stebelska (1892-1984)... also known as Marevna. Of note: in 1919 Marevna gave birth to a daughter fathered by Rivera who, as we know, later married (Patron Saint) Frida Kahlo. More of Marevna's work can be found here.
Speaking of Patron Saints, there was another, German-American visionary and Transcendentalist artist, Agnes Pelton (1881–1961), who can be counted among the women who appear here. Her Patron Saint article is here. Her 1939 painting below, Sea Change, was sourced from a Whitney Museum of American art page. As it was, Pelton was one of two female artists asked to join the Transcendentalist Painting Goup, the other was Florence Miller Pierce (1918-2007). You can find her work here.
And, then, in the latter years of the 19th century, something marvelous occurred... and the 19th century dealt us one of its last cards: an American pioneer, an artist who, living for almost 100 years (1887-1986), would take us into the 20th century and beyond, finally setting the record straight for all female artists while inspiring countless others (myself included). That is, yes, women could be innovators in the art world, and yes, women could be masters at their craft, and, most definitely, women could contribute to the human footprint sans the obligatory "baby-bump." Her name was Georgia Totto O'Keeffe and she broke every rule in the book, besting the men at their own game without batting an eyelash. She is, in fact, Trans-D's missing Patron Saint #12... but, if I never get to her, know that I meant to. Of all her prolific work she is best known for her massive flower paintings (Inset left is Red Canna (1924); another painting is below the jump); organic marvels of which she said: “When you take a flower in your hand and really look at it, it's your world for the moment. I want to give that world to someone else.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df4cb/df4cb70b29d2122a19b2e84c94d7010d46391bb8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0964a/0964ac1815407e8050e2916a4c9b8925d04d06a8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00ad7/00ad745cf832dc18f5c6c50a5213047ec54aedb4" alt=""
First in line: the 1939 painting, Rhythm Colour no. 1076, by Ukrainian-born French artist Sonia Delaunay (1885-1979) - above, inset left - who co-founded Orphism (a form of cubism) with her more celebrated husband, French artist, Robert Delauney. Wiki tells us that "she was the first living female artist to have a retrospective exhibition at the Louvre in 1964."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c682a/c682afcc012cbf4636111b46e2a28d20aed2b803" alt=""
Speaking of Patron Saints, there was another, German-American visionary and Transcendentalist artist, Agnes Pelton (1881–1961), who can be counted among the women who appear here. Her Patron Saint article is here. Her 1939 painting below, Sea Change, was sourced from a Whitney Museum of American art page. As it was, Pelton was one of two female artists asked to join the Transcendentalist Painting Goup, the other was Florence Miller Pierce (1918-2007). You can find her work here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/467aa/467aacb38e45f24be32c01d71b157d570e459dc2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d9f0/6d9f0b415f624794fabcd3fb230ff28bcce62d94" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bbc9/6bbc9a08456a953a541653aea145313fe658d335" alt=""
Inset left (above) is one of O'Keefe's 1937 pastels inspired by Ghost Ranch: Red Hills and White Flower, reminiscent of one of Alice Pelton's transcendentalist visions. An inspirational page for artists featuring quotes by O'Keefe can be be found here.
____________________________________________________
The Rise of the African-American Women Artists
“If Black women were free, it would mean that everyone else would have to be free since our freedom would necessitate the destruction of all systems of oppression.”
- A quote from the members of the black feminist lesbian organization: the Combahee River Collective (1974-1980). The quote was found on this page.
"Creative art is for all time and is therefore independent of time. It is of all ages, of every land, and if by this we mean the creative spirit in man which produces a picture or a statue is common to the whole civilized world, independent of age, race and nationality; the statement may stand unchallenged."
- A quote from artist, Alma Thomas, 1970.
***
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f232/4f232a3f566dd8f20db2aeb8742a6a878328a5a2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c10c4/c10c4f02fd4327bf74bce71b88c4908bcd57fed2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5d7/cd5d797798166a60255c9ce290f3a5f88e9d81b8" alt=""
![]() |
Augusta Savage in action, 1939, found on the blog Entrée to Black Paris. |
Born at the very beginning of the 20th century, we have Nellie Mae Rowe (1900-1982), a folk artist of the fantastic, and (in temperament) a playful outsider who devoted the last 30 years of her life to a body of work ranging from paintings to assemblages to sculpture. Happily, her artwork became very popular and continues to be a success. Below is her painting from 1981: Woman Scolding Her Companion. More of her work can be found here.
____________________________________________________
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eec1/5eec15b5f32cc3dfe6da5c2c49c00e166dc6332c" alt=""
Regarding Fini and Tanning, it is only in the past year that there's been an influx of new material about the artists made available on the internet. I had no such luck when I mentioned them in the 2012 Kay Sage post. Both were fascinating artists, however, and I've found good image sources for both. The Dorthea Tanning painting above was found here. She also has a website now. I've highlighted Leonor Fini in a separate section (coming up next)
![]() |
Alegoría del invierno (Allegory of Winter), 1948, Remedios Varo |
____________________________________________________
"A handy guide to living life the Leonor way..."
![]() |
La Lecon de Botanique (The Botany Lesson) oil on canvas - 1974, Leonor Fini |
“I strike it, stalk it, try to make it obey me. Then in its disobedience, it forms things I like.”
"In 1942, Fini made artistic history by painting the first ever erotic nude portrait of a man made by a woman. She continued to depict males in an unconventional manner - soft, androgynous, powerless and beautiful. 'The man in my painting sleeps because he refuses the animus role of the social and constructed and has rejected the responsibility of working in society toward those ends,' Fini said in a 1982 interview. Simply put, Fini’s male subjects were in touch with their feminine sides."
"In 1942, Fini made artistic history by painting the first ever erotic nude portrait of a man made by a woman. She continued to depict males in an unconventional manner - soft, androgynous, powerless and beautiful. 'The man in my painting sleeps because he refuses the animus role of the social and constructed and has rejected the responsibility of working in society toward those ends,' Fini said in a 1982 interview. Simply put, Fini’s male subjects were in touch with their feminine sides."
- Two quotes from Leonor Fini via the Huffington Post article: How To Be A Surrealist Queen, According To Artist Leonor Fini.
![]() |
Dans La Tour (In the Tower), 1952, Leonor Fini |
- Text and Images (upper and inset left) sourced from this Weinstein Gallery page. The Weinstein Gallery was very instrumental in pulling Leonor Fini out of the obscurity she had fallen into after her death.
***
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21c48/21c48bc16709b21e02ea02f4025682527b264d73" alt=""
In the 2015 article, however, we find ten suggestions which are not so much in Fini's words (she died in 1996) but are based on elements of her lifestyle. While I don't suspect all feminist artists would choose to live life the "Leonor way," well, the following list will certainly resonate with some of us(!):
- Play dress up, and not just as a child.
- Find inspiration, wherever you may find it.
- Follow your dreams. No, literally, follow them.
- Choose your friends wisely.
- Make men your muse.
- Resist categorization... in art and in life.
- Surround yourself with things you love. (And if those things are cats, do not hold back.)
- Make your home your sanctuary.
- Ignore the haters.
- Spread your skills far and wide.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2867/b2867dfc890752aac756c61c59d00acb5286e418" alt=""
____________________________________________________
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22a6e/22a6e7f6782d4be13e382048be86079eb142bcae" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60644/60644acb08423e8538c52f02e40fe2c6c84a73ef" alt=""
![]() |
A 2005 collage/assemblage by Aube Elléouët (Breton) found here. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ece4/9ece46af0502851e4e5e25b5b976043dfa22a4a1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd4d5/fd4d576b41d416aa89bf6c52b5dae6e33870706c" alt=""
As it often happens, while researching one artist, I end up with a total of three (apparently my operative number). So, along with Toyen I was introduced to Méret Oppenheim (1913-1985), who, in spite of her own body of Surrealist sculptural work was generally known (for the most part) as the model of photographer Man Ray. You know: that story. However, in the interests of herstory, I will direct you to this page, where both her work and her fabulous, empowering portrait (inset left) can be found.
Claude Cahun (1894-1954), on the other hand - pictured below - was so aggressively and progressively androgynous and ambiguous, she might have just stepped off the fashion runway today. Known especially for her photographic self-portraits (see here where the portrait below was sourced), in which she often appears with a shaved head, she - like many of the New Women born slightly earlier - felt lesbianism represented an alternative understanding of what it meant to be a woman. By the way, her partner and collaborator was her step-sister, Marcel Moore... who was also her lover.
![]() |
Self portrait - Silver Gelatin - 1928, Claude Cahun. "Under this mask, another mask; I will never finish removing all these faces." |
I would also like to include one last Surrealist from this period: Syrian surrealist Amy Nimr (1907-1974) for which there is not, yet, a Wiki entry. I first found mention of her existence in an article about Egyptian Surrealists of the 1930's, specifically and the exhibit Art et Liberté. Below is an excerpt from a bibliographical note (found here):
![]() |
Girl in a Fishnet - 1928, Amy Nimr |
BTW, while all the Surrealists mentioned in the section (above) were born in (or very nearly in) the first decade of the 20th century, interestingly, a few of them survived till its last decade and into the 21st Century!
![]() |
Frida (Kahlo) in New York,1946. Photo credit: Nickolas Muray. |
____________________________________________________
Second Wave Feminism - An Elemental Force
![]() |
Cumul I - 1968, Louise Bourgeois. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9d0d/d9d0da3b0acaf3dda1d54d696d4adecbe0c90ee0" alt=""
Feminist art is all the stages of a woman giving birth to herself."
- Excerpt from What is Feminist Art?, 1977, lithograph, 1977, Judy Chicago (inset left).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cec66/cec664d5261ff844717dc5b77483722fba273984" alt=""
Role integration encourages a broader mental and emotional growth in black women and men as they share the responsibility of working towards liberation... Neither of them should have their potentiality for self-determination controlled and predetermined by the opposite sex. That is a type of slavery that will not deliver us as a people..."
- Excerpt from the introduction of the Black Woman's Manifesto, 1970, by Gayle Lynch, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Maxine Williams, Frances Beal and Linda La Rue. The Manifesto was published by the Third World Women's Alliance (TWWA), a radical feminist organization by and for women-of-color, which ran from the late 1960s till the 80's. Inset right was the original cover.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74b3d/74b3deed3109ddef793281b1e2e8f03719b6ced1" alt=""
One woman in handcuffs was hit over the head by an officer. She pleaded with the crowd to “do something.” They responded by throwing pennies and other objects at the police. As the crowd reached hundreds, a full-blown riot ensured. Ten police officers barricaded themselves inside the Stonewall. The crowd set fire to the barricade."
- Excerpt from a Stonewall Inn historical account found here. Inset left is a poster for a 1994 Stonewall themed musical - Stonewall: Night Variations - written and directed by Tina Landau and produced by Annie Hamberger. The poster art was created by Joanna Jasinska and found on this Stonewall page. For other Stonewall Inn accounts try here and here.
"If America's soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read 'Vietnam.'"
- Martin Luther King Jr.,1967.
***
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0056/e0056ed0a65f39eef2943ae60b984dd8163b0f1d" alt=""
Yet, none of these artists would reach their stride or leave their footprint in the art world till a necessary baptism-by-fire occurred, and this would be the legacy of the 1960s and early 1970s. This was a time when the proverbial "shit-house" - that is, the status quo envisioned by bigots, racists, misogynists, homophobes and the "powers that be" - went up in flames; whether it was the neighborhood of Watts, or the burning barricade at Stonewall Inn. Contrastingly, this was the time when there was a war in which, for the first time in human history, masses of young men refused to participate, and, of those who did, many would eventually condemn it.*** At the same time, culturally, the renaissance continued producing more art, more films, more music, more literature than anyone could have foreseen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f8fd/9f8fd580556c448ad203b46bc008b942f83be746" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6972f/6972fe3f7a8505c19ce68d1d8d8af1c7e14a42db" alt=""
![]() |
Two views of Mrs N's Palace, 1964-77, Louise Nevelson. It is installed at the Metropolitan Museum in New York. |
Which is not to say that all woman artists working at that time were moved to jump on the feminist bandwagon. Many older artists simply didn't want to be attached to any variety of label, such as Georgia O'Keefe, and Louise Nevelson. But, then, when Nevelson proclaimed "I am a woman's liberation," it wasn't just bravado; it was an undisputed fact. Everything about her work (and her life) demolished any and all "woman artist" stereotypes. Incidentally, Nevelson, too, succumbed to the charms of Diego Rivera. Well, at least the man had good taste in women!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0614c/0614cc53903f01d9fef3c56c900fb6a7e436be0c" alt=""
Not that I actually saw much of her work till after her death, but, it is certainly very virtually available now... one of the best things about new technology! Her sculptures (inset right and left below) - variations of Nature Study 1984-94 - are almost Ancient Egyptian-like idols to sexual ambiguity... that is, until we look closely at the posture of the pink version, which seems to bend under the weight of the creature's immense breasts.
Was Bourgeois unconsciously (or consciously) making a sly statement about a feminine stereotype: a headless torso, a baby-machine... mutilated and crippled by her obligatory role - and, in some countries, her state-sanctioned role - to breed and nurture regardless of her own needs, circumstances and reality? (Remember, abortion laws vary all over the world, and, even in the States, the Roe v. Wade judgement didn't occur till 1973).
Bourgeois, herself, was the mother of three sons, but she's more or less the exception to the rule when it comes to artists and children. Of all the women mentioned in this post, the majority did not breed. Needless to say, a number of them lived into their 90s. But, like Georgia O'Keefe - who remained childless - Bourgeois was pushing 100 when she passed, so, there's not (necessarily) a connection between breeding and longevity. (But, then again, Dorthea Tanning - childless - lived to 102... so, might there be?) In any case, you can find more of
Bourgeois's work here, here, and here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6406c/6406c00223259d6eff310b834eef4b487a0548d3" alt=""
____________________________________________________
Alice Neel, a Painter of Portraits
![]() |
Jackie Curtis and Ritta Redd - oil on canvas - 1970, Alice Neel. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83bd3/83bd388c407579253bed1edf3a731acf48176577" alt=""
- Victorian art historian, Léon Legrange, in Gazette des beaux-arts, 1860 (found here). Inset left is Neel's portrait of her son Hartley (1966).
Frankly, I never realized that portraits were considered a "girlie" thing. But, in the interests of fighting sexism with sexism, my interpretation is that women, who have an intuitive grasp of character, simply have more interest and, therefore, more sensitivity to the psychological aspects of their subjects and are more proficient in portraying the subliminal codes inherent in human form.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1655/c16554dae527c48d005ed16fdb1c973a68821261" alt=""
- An excerpt from a description of Neel's painting Jackie Curtis and Ritta Redd (above) sourced here. Neel was also known to call herself "a collector of souls." She was possibly one of the first artists to portray gay couples, transvestites, pregnant women and completely nude men in casual positions. The photo (inset right) is of John Curtis Holder, Jr. - aka Jackie Curtis - a Warhol Superstar. More about Jackie can be found on this Andy Warhol site page.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d308/7d308247ad1165fcad29f305f8ec95bce00316b2" alt=""
- Excerpt from Wiki's Alice Neel entry (linked to in the paragraph previous to this section).
'Frightful, isn’t it?' Neel cackled to critic Ted Castle. 'I love it. At least it shows a certain revolt against everything decent.'"
- Excerpt from the wonderful (2017) article: Alice Neel: How to Persevere and Live the Artist's Life by Bridget Quinn. The photo of Neel shown previously was also sourced there.
***
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb008/cb008fec4dcc8e940f2312e8bff98c492f87e6f0" alt=""
Inset right is Neel's enigmatic portrait (1930): Rhoda Myers with Blue Hat.
____________________________________________________
Also, while I had hoped, in this post, to move past the 1970s and into the 21st century, after discovering a number of earlier 20th century artists worthy of mention, it gradually became impossible. So - as is often the case with my best-laid plans - much of the material I gathered for this post will find itself in Qualifying Feminism: Empowerment and the Arts (Part IIIc).
BTW, one of those artists - and I think you know which one - will be following us into third wave feminism along with a number of other artists who became artists during the second-wave. Feminist "waves" and feminist artists are not necessarily equal, nor interchangeable... and that, too, is the meaning of empowerment.
____________________________________________________
* Synchronistically, during the course of this post, this article just happened to arrive on my home page: Traditional masculinity officially labeled 'harmful' by the American Psychological Association. And I quote:
“'Traditional masculinity ideology has been shown to limit males’ psychological development, constrain their behavior, result in gender role strain and gender role conflict and negatively influence mental health and physical health,' according to the 36-page report, featured in January’s issue of Monitor on Psychology."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9f0e/b9f0e63def049509b7c6cc0f46ce79c0cb41a07b" alt=""
"As well as being 'an artist of stunning originality and strength', she was an exceptionally late bloomer, starting the work for which she is best known at the age of 57... Carr was also an artist who succeeded against the odds, living in an artistically unadventurous society, and working mostly in seclusion away from major art centers..."
Inset left is a photograph of Carr and below is her 1939 painting Odds & Ends. Both images were sourced from her Wiki entry. More can be found here.
*** (UPDATE, April 8, 2019). I recently found the book An Accidental Soldier: Memoirs of a Mestizo in Vietnam by Vietnam vet, Manny Garcia, in which he harrowingly describes his service in the army - specifically in Vietnam - and his eventual difficulties in dealing with post-war civilian life. This quote - a slightly abbreviated version of one appearing on the book's jacket, illustrates the ludicrousness of sending virtual boys off to war and the psychological damage incurred:
"This was my first kill. I killed a woman before I made love to one. I killed a woman before I was old enough to vote. I killed a woman before I bought my first car... I killed a woman before I knew she was a woman. I killed a woman wile working for the United States Army in South Vietnam. I had killed before I lived. The afternoon in the jungle was bright and hot. I stood there sweating, bewildered, dumbfound and completely absorbed by the power."
Note the last 4 words of that quote. Towards the end of Garcia's story, now disenchanted with - and emotionally crippled by - the war and all that it represents, he describes the various medals he received and why and when he ended up tossing them on the White House lawn:
"These medals and citations were awarded to me, supposedly, for displaying courage or valor under fire. I didn't see it that way. I saw the truth. I was decorated for committing assorted acts of unconscionable savagery upon other men. Occasionally, I energetically slaughtered them and I was heartily patted on the back for it - good boy. The more savage and ruthless I became, the more prestigious the medal that followed."
Later note: Reading the online Amazon reviews of Garcia's book, it seems other vets claim that he fictionalized his account. If you feel compelled to read the reviews, I suggest reading them till the very last when other views are presented.
“Dominator culture teaches all of us that the core of our identity is defined by the will to dominate and control others. We are taught that this will to dominate is more biologically hardwired in males than in females. In actuality, dominator culture teaches us that we are all natural-born killers but that males are more able to realize the predator role. In the dominator model the pursuit of external power, the ability to manipulate and control others, is what matters most. When culture is based on a dominator model, not only will it be violent but it will frame all relationships as power struggles.”
- Another relevant quote by bell hooks.
*** (UPDATE, April 8, 2019). I recently found the book An Accidental Soldier: Memoirs of a Mestizo in Vietnam by Vietnam vet, Manny Garcia, in which he harrowingly describes his service in the army - specifically in Vietnam - and his eventual difficulties in dealing with post-war civilian life. This quote - a slightly abbreviated version of one appearing on the book's jacket, illustrates the ludicrousness of sending virtual boys off to war and the psychological damage incurred:
"This was my first kill. I killed a woman before I made love to one. I killed a woman before I was old enough to vote. I killed a woman before I bought my first car... I killed a woman before I knew she was a woman. I killed a woman wile working for the United States Army in South Vietnam. I had killed before I lived. The afternoon in the jungle was bright and hot. I stood there sweating, bewildered, dumbfound and completely absorbed by the power."
Note the last 4 words of that quote. Towards the end of Garcia's story, now disenchanted with - and emotionally crippled by - the war and all that it represents, he describes the various medals he received and why and when he ended up tossing them on the White House lawn:
"These medals and citations were awarded to me, supposedly, for displaying courage or valor under fire. I didn't see it that way. I saw the truth. I was decorated for committing assorted acts of unconscionable savagery upon other men. Occasionally, I energetically slaughtered them and I was heartily patted on the back for it - good boy. The more savage and ruthless I became, the more prestigious the medal that followed."
Later note: Reading the online Amazon reviews of Garcia's book, it seems other vets claim that he fictionalized his account. If you feel compelled to read the reviews, I suggest reading them till the very last when other views are presented.
***
- Another relevant quote by bell hooks.
My god.....such a fascinating in-depth look at amazing artists. The light you shine upon the struggle is blinding -- AND should be required reading for all.
ReplyDeleteWell said and BRAVO! Hell..this article is art.
Once again, you're too kind, sweets. I think the artists themselves made this post; my input was marginal. But, I must say one thing: all of the artists in this post, some born more than a hundred years ago, were so far ahead of their times that it's eerily astounding. They might all still be alive today... and that, in itself, is empowering.
ReplyDeleteRe: required reading. Yes, especially for young women artists. They should know these women. Not one artist mentioned here gave a flying f* about what anyone thought about her; they were fierce! I look at Méret Oppenheims's photograph or Claude Cahun's self-portrait and I'm so proud of these women. They're my sisters. So, yeah, that's very empowering... and that's my point with these posts. :-)
I think...some art - when you move outside of the decorative and period-representative realm -- is often timeless and can fit nearly any time (relatively speaking) because it speaks of something within the human shell.
DeletePower up. Just don't blow the circuits!
BTW, BG, thank you!
ReplyDeleteYou are most welcome, but of course.
Delete