![]() |
After the rain, Albuquerque - July 21, 2025, 3:05 pm, DS. |
(Sand spins into mountains,
Mountains spin into streams,
Streams spin into fountains;
Clouds are made of these.)
- The unpublished chant-like addendum to the poem, Nature's Signature, found here.
"The extensive and more personalized symbolism of clouds appearing in landscape painting at the turn of the twentieth century reflected the cognitive uncertainty we experience in relation to clouds, in their constant variability and instability, and the dictatorship of the imagination, which allows only a subjective description of the phenomenon."
- A quote from the excellent article: Cloudscapes over the Baltic Sea–Cloud Motifs in Finnish, Swedish, German, Russian, Polish, Lithuanian, and Latvian Symbolic Landscape Painting around 1900. The highlighted text acknowledging our "cognitive uncertainty" regarding clouds really resonated with me, but not merely for the reasons described. For someone who has invested a great deal of time watching them, the uncertainty lies in the method of their creation. While, logically one cannot accept intelligence is involved, it is also difficult to accept, in some cases, that clouds are fashioned merely by the random fluctuations of air currents. That is, unless we redefine our concept of "random," (made, done, happening, or chosen without method or conscious decision)... or, maybe, come to the understanding that, in nature, "random" includes patterns & processes not, yet, fully understood.
![]() |
The random appearance of a cicada in a cloud shot. Cellphone photo, August 25, 2025, 4:28 pm, DS. |
The cloud introducing this post is one of the exceptional clouds. It possesses an almost unworldly presence. Perhaps, this is due to the subdued coloring of the sky that day after it had rained. It has a dreamlike quality. What is especially intriguing about it, however, is that it's a cloud which is in the process of transforming. Moreover, it isn't isolated; it appears to be one element in a peculiar circle of clouds. (See below)
![]() |
An odd ring of clouds - July 21, 2025, 3:07 pm, DS. |
What defines art when the source is nature (or Chaos if you prefer - that lovely term defining the Whole of the Universe into the language of mathematics)? The answer, of course, is that art is recognized by the viewer, although this is not the same as "defining". The universe is composed of art on every level of definition (from the mathematical fractal to the tallest mountain and drifting clouds). Only imagination is needed to fully enjoy this inherent weaving of process, material and presentation. The sum of the whole is greater than the parts. Art is a human term, thus ultimately I suppose, human imagination is required to appreciate this display of existence.
ReplyDeleteTough question, but I am certain we will be further enlightened by your musings.
Thanks, BG!
DeleteWell, art is a term in some languages; how definitions differ might be interesting... but, while beauty may lie in the eye of the beholder, sophistication - finesse in design and execution - is really not up for grabs. It's either there or it isn't perceived. Perception, on the other hand, might be a relative thing depending upon one's sensitivity, knowledge and experience.
Imagination is the wild card... similar to "dream." It gets complicated. Ultimately, we're dealing with the most controversial term of all, the C-word, consciousness... that is, consciousness by degree.
.
I'm still working on the Imaginarium post. It merely has to be perfect. ;-) But, here's a clue: a little goldfish driving a car!
https://youtu.be/RokRxQG8aC0